Film Review: Dirty Dancing (Re-Make)

Posted on

3- of 5 stars to the re-make of the film Dirty Dancing, just released on ABC TV in May, 2017. I had no clue they were doing a re-make of this movie until a few days before it aired, and I only knew because I happened to catch a quick promo in between watching on TV shows. I wonder why they didn’t advertise this one too much… wait… I know…

Was there any need to even do a re-make? Let’s dive in to the review… quick side note — I’m not going to do a typical review where I compare and contrast… I’m just throwing a few key thoughts out about the re-make and opening it up to questions and feedback!


dancing                       original



The original Dirty Dancing movie was a phenomenon when released in 1987. I was ten years old and not originally allowed to watch the movie, as it was considered too racy; however, my mom later caved when we were visiting with friends one weekend. I remember my mom and her friend Joyce discussing whether it was appropriate for me and for Joyce’s daughter, Robin, who was 2-years older than me. Ultimately, because the mothers wanted to watch it, they caved and let us watch it, too. But I also recall being asked to close our eyes at a few parts and even asked to leave the room for 5 minutes when the whole abortion discussion came up.

Anyways…trying to stay on track here… I really liked the movie, but I wasn’t a crazy fanatic who fell in love with Patrick Swayze or Jennifer Grey, nor felt the need to watch it every time it was on. I’ve seen it a few times, love many of the songs and I fully admit, when they do the lift, I am on a bit of a high. I have never practiced it tho… either the lifter or the liftee! Have you?????

If you’ve never seen it (what rock do you live under as I need to send you a VHS, as that’s probably the video equipment you’re still using… but then how are you reading this post? Oh @#$#$, now my brain hurts!)…. it’s about a family who vacations in the Catskills in upstate NY in the 1960s/1970s. The father’s a doctor, the mother’s a housewife. They have two girls, about 18 and 20. While on vacation, Baby, the younger daughter, decides to take some dancing lessons and essentially falls for the instructor, Johnny, who is trying to make a living and stay out of trouble. Johnny’s dance partner has a sort-of-botched abortion and can’t dance for a few weeks. Baby steps in, without her family knowing, and has the “time of her life.” Once her family learns about what she’s been up to, they try to stop it; however, it’s too late, as she’s fallen in love with Johnny.

There are tons of other side-stories, but this is the primary one…  somewhere between romance and family drama, it had women swooning over Patrick Swayze, people talking about Jennifer Grey’s funny-shaped nose and it created a whole new generation of people rooting for less “restrictions” in life. (That’s way over simplifying this movie… but if you haven’t seen it, there’s no point in reading my mini-review of the re-make version, right????)

But I’m not wrong, am I???

Focus Jay… so, someone decided to re-make this movie 30 years later… and thus, I have a few comments and questions.

Notable Points

  • Main Roles / Stars
    • Abigail Breslin plays Baby (Primary Character, AKA Frances)
    • Colt Prattes plays Johnny
    • Sarah Hyland plays Lisa (older sister)
    • Nicole Scherzinger plays Penny (Johnny’s dancing partner)
    • Bruce Greenwood plays Jake (father)
    • Debra Messing plays Marjorie (mother)
    • Katey Saga plays Vivian (older woman seducing Johnny)
    • Shane Harper plays Robbie (father of Penny’s baby)
    • At least other 10 characters / actors (some famous) but minor roles
  • Differences (don’t read if you don’t want spoilers)
    • Baby and Johnny don’t end up together — that’s just gonna piss off people
    • Vivian has a much larger role in trying to nail Johnny — love her, but why???
    • Marjorie wants to divorce Jake — eh, weak plot device
    • Lisa enters into an inter-racial romance, while her fling with Robbie is very short — kudos for the change
    • Baby wrote a book, and a Broadway play is made of her time doing “Dirty Dancing” — a bit odd


What did I think?

I would have given the original movie a 4+ out of 5 stars. I gave the re-make a 3- out of 5 stars. I wanted to give it a 2, but by my definition, that would have said it was pretty bad. If there weren’t ever an original Dirty Dancing, then I think I would have been fine with this new one, hence settling on a 3- for the re-made version.

A few things that irked me:

  • The things they chosen to do differently didn’t really add any value; they took away from the overall story. I’m sure they added some to give meatier roles to other actors and actress and hopefully bring in their fans to watch the re-make. And I love Katey Sagal, but we didn’t need the additional story points with Vivian. While I enjoyed the latter part of the romance between Jake and Marjorie, their relationship issues didn’t impact me in the first part.

  • I didn’t agree with most of the casting, which was my main problem. They went for the “ultra-hot guy” with 12 pack abs (Aside: I know that’s not possible, but coming from a 2-pack-maybe-4-pack-on-a-good-day-when-I-didn’t-eat-pizza-or-drink-the-night-before-guy… come on… not right… I mean who feels the need to focus on that when there’s so much more to discuss in this movie… oh wait, I just spoke about my own body, ugh… just like the movie – big mistake!… shut up now), but that wasn’t the normal body type in the 1960s/1970s (pointed out by my significant other)… So it did not feel authentic, especially when they did a lot to “cover up” Abigail Breslin who while quite beautiful, does not have your “typical” dancer-body as compared to every one else dancing in the movie. For many reasons, I thought she was a good “Baby,” but I couldn’t stop thinking about her from her role on Scream Queens to realistically look at her in a more serious and meaty role.
  • I’m off topic again… my point being… they went in opposite directions with casting the two leads, highlighting body shapes/types when that really has absolutely nothing to do with the romance, dancing or movie??? It shouldn’t have ever been something to pick up on, except for the fact that the camera folks seemed to purposely focus on it. Johnny should have been a more regular-looking guy in good shape [max 2-pack abs with just a few bulges in his arms — pick either triceps or biceps, right?] and not a focus on every single one of his muscles as the thing to admire. (As I did admire it… let’s be real!)

A few things I liked:

  • It felt like it was recorded in the proper time period, including the background setting, clothing and location shoots.
  • The new music, as I believe they couldn’t either get the rights to the original versions, or didn’t want to replicate those parts for fear of the ultimate in comparisons, worked well. I didn’t like them a much as the original, but they still had some light and fun moments, one or two sexy moments and they created a great compilation overall.

Why even do a re-make?

The ultimate question… when something is so good, why put effort into a re-make when you know it will never come close to the original. And even if they found the perfect actors and actresses, it will always be compared to something that some people feel is their favorite movie ever… If you’re going to re-make a movie like this one, the changes should be very clear and specific. This one felt like it had differences in all the wrong places… lost some of the original sultry aspects and awkward yet embracing charm… and the casting was too far off the original to bring about the right overall mood.

Should movies ever be re-made? What do you think?  What did you think of this one? Please share… would love to hear from those who loved the original and watched the re-make, as well as those who thought the re-make was a fantastic shout-out to the original!


About Me

I’m Jay and I live in NYC. By profession, I work in technology. By passion, I work in writing. Once you hit my site “ThisIsMyTruthNow” at, you can join the fun and see my blog and various site content. You’ll find book reviews, published and in-progress fiction, TV/Film reviews, favorite vacation spots and my own version of the “365 Daily Challenge.” Since March 13, 2017, I’ve posted a characteristic either I currently embody or one I’d like to embody in the future. 365 days of reflection to discover who I am and what I want out of life… see how you compare!

Feel free to like, rate, comment or take the poll for each post. Tell me what you think. Note: All written content is my original creation and copyrighted to me, but the graphics and images were linked from other sites and belong to them. Many thanks to their original creators.


37 thoughts on “Film Review: Dirty Dancing (Re-Make)

    susandyer1962 said:
    June 5, 2017 at 10:39 AM

    I didn’t like the remake at all…….

    Happy Monday!!

    Liked by 1 person

    bmary8222 said:
    June 5, 2017 at 10:48 AM

    You make some very interesting points. Thanks for sharing.


    shalini said:
    June 5, 2017 at 10:49 AM

    Don’t even want to see the remake… Give me the original anytime

    Liked by 1 person

      James J. Cudney IV responded:
      June 5, 2017 at 10:53 AM

      Definitely for this one, I agree… probably most anything. Trying to come up with a re-make that was better???

      Liked by 1 person

        shalini said:
        June 5, 2017 at 11:01 AM

        I hardly see movies nowadays so no idea but I prefer the older ones… I can relate to 80s more

        Liked by 1 person

    There are certain movies that should NEVER have been remade including Dirty Dancing. I’m also adding Footloose and the upcoming The Mummy to my short list. In my experience remakes seldom live up to the original. The only one in my experience that did was Fox’s Grease: Live, which actually was more in keeping with the original Broadway play. As far as Dirty Dancing goes, I thought most of the cast was okay, except for Prattes who I thought was just awful. The movie itself lacked the magic and charm of the original and the ending left me wanting to bang my head against a wall.😡

    Liked by 2 people

    mistysbookspace said:
    June 5, 2017 at 11:55 AM

    I have yet to watch the remake of it but I have seen previews and just from seeing the previews my opinion is they ruined it. I was/am a huge fan of the original. I would go as far as to say it is one of my all time favorite movies.

    Liked by 1 person

      James J. Cudney IV responded:
      June 5, 2017 at 11:57 AM

      Oh, you definitely don’t want to watch it then… or watch them in a row so you can have a high with the low!

      Liked by 1 person

        mistysbookspace said:
        June 5, 2017 at 11:59 AM

        Yeah when I first saw they were remaking it I was like oh cool but after seeing the pre Jews I’m not so sure I will ever watch it.

        Liked by 1 person

    Lana (Sleepless in wherever) said:
    June 5, 2017 at 11:58 AM

    No way in hell am I watching that disaster of a movie. Dirty Dancing and Grease were top two movis of my childhood (thankfully no one restricted my access to them). I had both movies on VHS and they both struggled to keep themselves whole until I upgraded to DVDs. And if Grease: Live was pretty good I admit, Dirty Dancing remake is a fail through and through.

    Liked by 1 person

    Kristin said:
    June 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM

    Reasons for a remake? There are no good reasons for a remake. Ever. Unless the first movie sucked. 😂

    Liked by 1 person

      James J. Cudney IV responded:
      June 5, 2017 at 3:18 PM

      which begs the question… what movie premise was fantastic but turned out awful and needs to be remade? Ha!


        Kristin said:
        June 5, 2017 at 3:22 PM

        Not movie but they need to remake the Sword of Truth series. So awful. They did such a bad job representing that book series that I couldn’t finish watching. I want a GOOD Sword of Truth remake!

        Liked by 1 person

    cwhiteweb said:
    June 5, 2017 at 3:44 PM

    😂 😂 the comment after “if you’ve never seen it”,
    Interesting, thy did a remake. Hmm, something to see

    Liked by 1 person

      James J. Cudney IV responded:
      June 5, 2017 at 3:46 PM

      Oh no…. that means you need to get the VHS tape! You should watch a few video clips online of the original There’s some key scenes that’ll show you if you’d like the whole movie or not.


        cwhiteweb said:
        June 5, 2017 at 3:49 PM

        Haha i was born years later, but Dirty Dancing was a movie we weren’t allowed to watch either, along with Basic Instinct! I do wanna see the remake though,

        Liked by 1 person

        James J. Cudney IV responded:
        June 5, 2017 at 3:50 PM

        Partially understandable. 🙂 You have to see the original before the remake. That’s a must! Or you’ll end up having to change outfits twice as much for future dates.

        Liked by 1 person

        cwhiteweb said:
        June 5, 2017 at 3:53 PM

        True, as I am not sure how much I remember from the original!
        Hahahahaha and we do not want that, do we!

        Liked by 1 person

    jennanicolee said:
    June 5, 2017 at 5:05 PM

    ….it’s just wrong lol! I wanted to like it because I love Abigail but the original was just perfect! I didn’t even finish it because I couldn’t handle it. The original felt sexy and beautiful and captivating and overall just flippin phenomenal. This was just…blah. Great points though!

    Liked by 1 person

      James J. Cudney IV responded:
      June 5, 2017 at 5:07 PM

      Thanks. I agree with you. I could have been OK with Abigail for the role had the others been cast well, too. Instead it came across very disjointed. Blah is right.

      Liked by 1 person

    hsimone said:
    June 6, 2017 at 1:10 AM

    I didn’t realize they were doing a re-make. Honestly, I don’t even know why movie producers (or whoever makes movie decisions) decide to create a re-make. The only re-makes I tend to like more are from animated to live action, but even then only some end up being good.

    You had some great points and I learned two important things:
    1) There is a Dirty Dancing movie re-make
    2) I don’t have any inclination to watch it, lol

    Thank you for the great film review!

    Liked by 1 person

      James J. Cudney IV responded:
      June 6, 2017 at 6:36 AM

      I’m glad to be of service. It wasn’t widely advertised. I appreciate your humorous reply. Thank you!

      Liked by 1 person

        hsimone said:
        June 6, 2017 at 10:00 AM

        Makes sense. Though I do tend to miss some of the even more advertised movies/shows, so I wasn’t sure if I was in a cave somewhere when it was announced or it wasn’t really advertised.

        Glad you found my reply humorous. Thank you! 😀

        Liked by 1 person

    […] Dirty Dancing Re-Make (2017) […]

    Liked by 1 person

    vinnieh said:
    July 20, 2017 at 8:47 AM

    I’ve never seen the remake and don’t plan too. Your post however was highly entertaining.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s